Genealogy Rant

I have been active genealogist for most of my life. Early in the piece I would use all manner of software, including Family Tree Maker etc. But as my interests moved on from compiling extensive lists and gedcom files, to being more about the story, I haven’t bothered so much with that kind of approach anymore. Oh, and I absolutely abhor Ancestry.com for the way in which genealogy has been commodified and paywalled, and a brief flirtation with it, refuse to use it on principle.

But after last weekend’s big family reunion, and in an effort to leave behind some “lists” I went looking online, and decided to revisit familysearch.org where you can now upload information, and link with family trees in a non-commercial manner (though noting the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints has a different agenda in relation to family trees).

The thing I hated most in linking up with existing family trees there? Clearly someone has just gone through a cut and paste process of other people’s work (including very obviously my own) and then got it horribly wrong. The name Ellen was written down as Eileen (several times). The mother’s maiden name was inserted as the child’s name in a very adhoc manner. The list of errors appalled me. And I’m guessing it was all about compiling a big list of names, rather than being an accurate source of information. Sorry, familysearch, you’re not the answer.

I’m sticking with jamesobrien.blog/genealogy

Other suggestions appreciated, though noting I prefer an online solution, as I mostly use a Chromebook, so not looking for more software to download.

9 comments

  • I am in a quandary about genealogy. I began with Geni, and copied about half to Ancestry but I didn’t like its business model. Familysearch might be the way to go. I just know someone has pretty well done my family tree, but I can’t find it unless I pay to look.

  • Hi I am married to a decendant. Similar with my own family history. There is a version a relative has made that has a lot of inaccuracies, however my brother has used source documents to verify possible connections and actual connections when compiling the tree. If you have the source documents and look for consistencies in dates and names rather than making assumptions- this includes copying others work without verification, you will have a more robust document. The tree was compiled as a word document adding drawing tools of boxs and lines. That way you can ensure only the people that are family access your personal information.

  • Janet Flemming

    wikitree is free and a grand idea … everyone helps everyone else and the idea is not to duplicate but to merge into one big tree

  • I believe, as an IT professional, that any genealogy site, should be used as a tool to aid research. Any information garnered by their algorithms, needs to be evaluated for accuracy. They are suggestions to be verified or discarded. I feel, many people believe the computer does all the work for them. This is a fallacy. As genealogists, we must use many tools and resources to discover source records and documents. It is these we must evaluate. I use many genealogy sites. I just happen to use Ancestry to record my family tree and source records. Thank you for this interesting blog. A warning for all of us not to rely on IT.

Please leave a comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s